Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Love me - love my character...

Having come up against this issue myself recently, I've been following recent discussions about the "likeability" of characters in novels with interest. When I first started writing my forthcoming novel, The Mistake, many moons ago, I deliberately attempted to create a character who I didn't really like - a woman I couldn't see myself getting on particularly well with, someone who wasn't ever going to be my best friend. The book was partly a response to the media's treatment of women like Lindy Chamberlain, Keli Lane, Kathleen Folbigg, and even Kate McCann, whose personality 'defects'- as represented (& judged) by the media - are regarded as somehow providing evidence of their guilt. It was important, then, that Jodie wasn't a character that readers would immediately identify with.

It's easy enough writing about a character who is obviously and deliberately 'bad' - like Carly in Where Have You Been?. This sort of character, determined to stir up trouble, having fun at others' expense, is fun to draw - a caricature of sorts, a necessary foil to the other more clearly sympathetic characters. But Jodie Garrow - the main protagonist of The Mistake - is something else altogether. She's ostensibly a good person - a good citizen, a good wife, a good mother. She's not malicious or angry or bent on revenge - or any of those things that makes for an enjoyably dislikeable character. It was very tricky trying to make her the type of woman I needed her to be - a little bit too buttoned up, socially ambitious, controlling, cool - while revealing just enough of her interior life to make her understandable, if not loveable.

While my agent was unfazed by the unsympathetic characterisation (but then she also sold Lionel Shriver's We Need to Talk About Kevin) the book was rejected a number of times for just that reason:

I'm sorry to also say that what I struggled with here was that I didn't really like any of the characters that much...;
There was something to her character that didn’t allow me to really feel sympathetic...;
Jodie (in particular) needs to be a more ... sympathetically drawn character to give the novel greater power...;
I worry that Jodie was just too unsympathetic a character to appeal to a commercial audience...

Luckily for me, my wonderful publisher, Belinda Byrne at Penguin, really 'got' Jodie, and though there's been some work done to deepen our understanding of the novel's characters, essentially they're all - including Jodie - still interestingly flawed.

Far from being afraid of characters they dont want to hug, I think most readers remain unfazed, too. As a friend said at a school Christmas do yesterday ( yes, we really did talk about books, if briefly!): "I don't need characters that I like, or even identify with. If they're bad, and good, recognisably human - that's enough."


1 comment:

Elizabeth Lhuede said...

This is fascinating, Wendy. I know this issue affects a lot of authors who are forced to change their protagonists' characters to make them more sympathetic for the reader.

I think it has to do with the difference between identification ("this women is like me") and empathy ("I understand how this - unlikeable - woman came to be the way she is"). In order to hook the reader into the novel's world, the author often has to go make the reader both identify and feel sympathy for, it seems, before revealing the less attractive side - but then there's the danger of disappointing the reader.

When a female character is unsympathetic from the start, it certainly attracts mixed reviews (like Aussie writer Kathleen Stewart's Men of Bad Character). I'll be interested to see how your novel is received.

Thanks for your help compiling lists for @AustralianWomenWriters, by the way. I hope you'll do a guest review for the blog some time during the year.